Falsificationism Redux Indeed: a Rebuttal of the Callahan Rejoinder

Readers of “Falsificationism Redux” (the rejoinder) may have found it to be another waffling non-explanation induction and the alleged falsity falsificationism—or even self-refuting, as its title indicates (redux: brought back, revived, restored). However, seems worth round replies if only because arguments are fairly typical would-be ‘inductivist’ might help some people who yet see how these fail.